
Open Margin
Critiques the copy you paste, one block at a time, using a script you can open and edit.
4.6(41)

What it does
Looks at a section of interface copy and says what is earning its place. Source is in the package, so you can change the eye it uses.
Open Margin is a blunt reader for a landing section, an empty state, or a settings panel. It talks about order, repetition, and proof — not taste in the abstract. The license includes the script. People who keep it usually edit one rule: what ‘proof’ means in their product.
- Notes are about a specific block, not a redesign.
- You can read and edit the script. The hash covers that source.
- It does not fetch your live site unless you paste the copy.
About the seller
- Rating
- 4.6
- Orders
- 210
- Replies
- Two days
Small creative utilities. One file is still in the review queue. We don’t print the badge ourselves.
Permission manifest
A bot file has to say what it can touch. Treat this the way you would a materials label.
- Low
Read the copy you paste
Text only. No account access.
- Low
Write a critique note
Local file.
Will not
- Redesign a whole product
- Fetch a URL you did not paste
- Store the copy beyond the run
Security review
Source reviewed in full. No network calls. The script is plain text in the package, matching the signed hash.
- Static pass over the package. No hidden send or spend calls.
- The permission list matches what the recorded run actually does.
- Sandbox execution. Network stays inside the declared fetches.
- Hash signed Jul 24, 2026. It is the hash in the buy box.
Before you install
- The copy, pasted. A screenshot described as text works; it does not see pixels.
- Any Grok or browser host.
After a license
- Open the package. The rubric is prompt/rubric.txt.
- Edit a rule if your product measures proof differently.
- Re-check the hash if you publish a modified file. The badge covers the original.
Changelog
1.3.1Jul 22, 2026
Repetition between headline and button is called out first.
1.2.0Mar 15, 2026
Source file split so the rubric is editable without touching the runner.
Ratings
4.6
41 ratings
Leah OrtizDesignerJul 1, 2026
I changed one line of the rubric and it stopped scolding illustrations. That is why source included matters.
Ben WalshWriterApr 19, 2026
Stern about repetition. Fair. It is not a visual critic and the listing is honest about that.
More like this
